Independent Editorial Review

Software Reviews Written by People Who've Actually Run a Veterinary Practice

Most veterinary software reviews are written by technology journalists who have never managed a controlled substance log, scheduled a multi-doctor surgery day, or dealt with a PIMS migration mid-quarter. Ours aren't.

What Practitioners Actually Care About
True monthly cost per doctor We report it
Controlled substance log compliance We test it
Migration difficulty & downtime We document it
Vendor-paid placement Never
Launching Soon Full reviews of Covetrus Pulse, IDEXX Neo, ezyVet, Cornerstone, Shepherd, and more — coming in 2026.

01

Why This Publication Exists

The veterinary PIMS market is opaque by design. Vendors guard pricing, obscure true implementation costs, and rely on the fact that switching software is painful enough that most practices stay put long after they should have left.

Meanwhile, the review sites that rank on Google are either pay-to-play platforms where vendors buy their ratings, or generalist tech blogs written by people who couldn't tell you the difference between Cornerstone and Covetrus if their careers depended on it.

We built Veterinary Software Reviews because veterinary practice owners deserve the same quality of independent evaluation that exists in other professional markets — rigorous, practitioner-informed, and free from vendor influence.

Every review on this site is written by someone who has managed a veterinary practice. They know what questions to ask, what numbers to push on, and what "works great" actually means at 7am on a Monday with a full surgery schedule.


02

Our Evaluation Methodology

i.
Practitioner-Written Reviews

Our veterinary vertical is covered by a writer with direct practice management experience. Not a journalist. Someone who has sat at the front desk, managed the schedule, and dealt with a PIMS outage on a busy Saturday.

ii.
True Cost of Ownership

We calculate and publish the real monthly cost per doctor — including implementation fees, training costs, add-on modules, and support tier pricing that vendors bury in their contracts.

iii.
Real User Surveys

We aggregate direct feedback from veterinary staff currently using each platform. What technicians, receptionists, and practice managers say privately about their software is often very different from vendor marketing.

iv.
No Sponsored Placements

Vendors cannot pay for higher ratings, featured placement, or editorial coverage. We maintain affiliate relationships with some software vendors — these are disclosed and never influence our ratings or rankings.


03

Software Under Review

Covetrus Pulse Cloud-based PIMS Review in progress
IDEXX Neo Cloud-based PIMS Review in progress
ezyVet Cloud-based PIMS Review in progress
Cornerstone Server-based PIMS Review in progress
Shepherd Cloud-based PIMS Review in progress
Impromed Server-based PIMS Review in progress

Full reviews, head-to-head comparisons, and TCO calculators publishing in 2026.

Are You a Veterinary Practice Administrator?

We are recruiting practitioners to contribute reviews and survey responses. If you have managed a veterinary practice and have opinions about your software, we want to hear from you.

Get Involved